PITCHER MATCHUP

Kade Anderson vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kade Anderson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kade Anderson's arsenal

Throws LHPvs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Slider 26%Changeup 18%Curveball 15%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kade Anderson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 KK Kyle Karros RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-20 game page →