PITCHER MATCHUP

Kade Anderson vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kade Anderson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kade Anderson's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .336vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Slider 25%Changeup 18%Curveball 15%Sinker 2%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kade Anderson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .367
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MS Myles Straw RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.