PITCHER MATCHUP

Justin Wrobleski vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Justin Wrobleski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Justin Wrobleski's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Slider 28%Sinker 11%Curveball 7%Cutter 5%Changeup 4%Sweeper 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Justin Wrobleski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .367
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-09 game page →