PITCHER MATCHUP

Justin Wrobleski vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Justin Wrobleski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Justin Wrobleski's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 27%Sinker 11%Curveball 7%Cutter 5%Changeup 4%Sweeper 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Justin Wrobleski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 648 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 602 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.