PITCHER MATCHUP

Justin Wrobleski vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Justin Wrobleski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Justin Wrobleski's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .298vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 28%Sinker 11%Curveball 7%Cutter 5%Changeup 4%Sweeper 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Justin Wrobleski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.