PITCHER MATCHUP

Justin Wrobleski vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Justin Wrobleski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Justin Wrobleski's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .296vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 28%Sinker 11%Curveball 7%Cutter 5%Changeup 4%Sweeper 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Justin Wrobleski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-15 game page →