PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .342vs RHH xwOBA .261Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.