PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .352vs RHH xwOBA .255Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Cutter 15%Changeup 15%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DR Drew Romo SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Romo
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-12 game page →