PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.