PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 BB Byron Buxton RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.