PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .342vs RHH xwOBA .261Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Byron Buxton RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →