PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Boston Red Sox

How the Boston Red Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Boston Red Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Boston Red Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 WA Wilyer Abreu LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wilyer Abreu
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JD Jarren Duran LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jarren Duran
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 645 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CR Ceddanne Rafaela RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ceddanne Rafaela
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Caleb Durbin RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Caleb Durbin
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willson Contreras RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willson Contreras
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 AR Adley Rutschman SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AM Andruw Monasterio RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andruw Monasterio
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CM Curtis Mead RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MY Masataka Yoshida LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masataka Yoshida
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.