PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .257Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 41%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 609 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ED Elias Díaz RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elias Díaz
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-15 game page →