PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .260Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 44%Slider 21%Cutter 15%Changeup 14%Four-Seam Fastball 6%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 MO Marcell Ozuna RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcell Ozuna
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JM Jake Mangum SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HD Henry Davis RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Davis
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JT Jared Triolo RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.