PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .300
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.