PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .254Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JW James Wood LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .436 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Curtis Mead RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-18 game page →