PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 633 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.