PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .350vs RHH xwOBA .257Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 21%Cutter 16%Changeup 15%Four-Seam Fastball 6%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 AF Alex Freeland SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-01 game page →