PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .255Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 43%Slider 21%Cutter 15%Changeup 14%Four-Seam Fastball 6%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sinker (43% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-20 game page →