PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.