PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .253Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 41%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (41% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.