PITCHER MATCHUP

J.T. Ginn vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against J.T. Ginn's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

J.T. Ginn's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .265Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 42%Slider 20%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Four-Seam Fastball 7%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against J.T. Ginn, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sinker (42% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.