PITCHER MATCHUP

JP Sears vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against JP Sears's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

JP Sears's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Sweeper 25%Changeup 17%Sinker 9%Slider 9%Curveball 2%Cutter 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against JP Sears, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 587 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 TE Tommy Edman SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.