PITCHER MATCHUP

JP Sears vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against JP Sears's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

JP Sears's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Sweeper 25%Changeup 17%Sinker 9%Slider 9%Curveball 2%Cutter 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against JP Sears, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 635 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 506 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.