PITCHER MATCHUP

JP Sears vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against JP Sears's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

JP Sears's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Sweeper 25%Changeup 17%Sinker 9%Slider 9%Curveball 2%Cutter 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against JP Sears, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MS Myles Straw RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.