PITCHER MATCHUP

José Soriano vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against José Soriano's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

José Soriano's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 39%Knuckle Curve 26%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Splitter 14%Slider 6%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against José Soriano, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KC Kody Clemens SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AM Austin Martin RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RL Royce Lewis RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TG Tristan Gray LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Gray
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-12 game page →