PITCHER MATCHUP

José Soriano vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against José Soriano's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

José Soriano's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 39%Knuckle Curve 26%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Splitter 14%Slider 6%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against José Soriano, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 653 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .438 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 557 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-07 game page →