PITCHER MATCHUP

José Soriano vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against José Soriano's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

José Soriano's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 39%Knuckle Curve 26%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Splitter 14%Slider 6%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against José Soriano, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 574 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 644 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .417 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-26 game page →