PITCHER MATCHUP

José Soriano vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against José Soriano's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

José Soriano's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .326vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 38%Knuckle Curve 26%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Splitter 14%Slider 6%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against José Soriano, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CY Christian Yelich LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DH David Hamilton LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.