PITCHER MATCHUP

José Soriano vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against José Soriano's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

José Soriano's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 38%Knuckle Curve 26%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Splitter 14%Slider 6%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against José Soriano, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 572 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.