PITCHER MATCHUP

José Soriano vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against José Soriano's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

José Soriano's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 39%Knuckle Curve 26%Four-Seam Fastball 16%Splitter 14%Slider 6%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against José Soriano, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 370 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-01 game page →