PITCHER MATCHUP

Jose Cabrera vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jose Cabrera's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jose Cabrera's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .375vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026
Cutter 26%Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sweeper 16%Curveball 12%Changeup 12%Sinker 9%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jose Cabrera, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Byron Buxton RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .423 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.