PITCHER MATCHUP

Jose Cabrera vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jose Cabrera's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jose Cabrera's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .347Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 26%Cutter 25%Sweeper 14%Changeup 14%Sinker 11%Curveball 9%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jose Cabrera, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.