PITCHER MATCHUP

Jose Cabrera vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jose Cabrera's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jose Cabrera's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .375vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026
Cutter 26%Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sweeper 16%Curveball 12%Changeup 12%Sinker 9%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jose Cabrera, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.