PITCHER MATCHUP

Joey Cantillo vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Joey Cantillo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Joey Cantillo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .343vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Changeup 28%Curveball 24%Slider 7%Cutter 3%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Joey Cantillo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .419 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BM Braden Montgomery SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-09 game page →