PITCHER MATCHUP

Joey Cantillo vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Joey Cantillo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Joey Cantillo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .297Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Changeup 27%Curveball 26%Slider 6%Cutter 5%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Joey Cantillo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .430 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.