PITCHER MATCHUP

Joey Cantillo vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Joey Cantillo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Joey Cantillo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .339vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Changeup 28%Curveball 23%Slider 7%Cutter 3%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Joey Cantillo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TW Taylor Walls SH .264
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NF Nick Fortes RHB .277
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BW Ben Williamson RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Williamson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-24 game page →