PITCHER MATCHUP

Joey Cantillo vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Joey Cantillo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Joey Cantillo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .333vs RHH xwOBA .299Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Changeup 28%Curveball 22%Slider 8%Cutter 2%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Joey Cantillo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LH Liam Hicks LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JM Joe Mack LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-12 game page →