PITCHER MATCHUP

Joey Cantillo vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Joey Cantillo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Joey Cantillo's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .291Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Changeup 28%Curveball 25%Slider 6%Cutter 4%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Joey Cantillo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JS Jose Siri RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 TH Tyler Heineman SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Heineman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →