PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .332vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 25%Slider 21%Sweeper 6%Cutter 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jonah Cox RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.