PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 25%Slider 22%Sweeper 6%Cutter 4%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 579 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 585 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Daniel Susac RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CK Christian Koss RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.