PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .305vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Slider 22%Sweeper 6%Cutter 4%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 WA Willy Adames RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 RD Rafael Devers LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 614 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MC Matt Chapman RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-25 game page →