PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .304vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 25%Slider 22%Sweeper 6%Cutter 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AF Alex Freeland SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-30 game page →