PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 25%Slider 22%Sweeper 6%Cutter 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TE Tommy Edman SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.