PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .333vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 25%Slider 21%Sweeper 6%Cutter 5%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 633 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.