PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .333vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 25%Slider 21%Sweeper 6%Cutter 5%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AF Alex Freeland SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.