PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 25%Slider 22%Sweeper 6%Cutter 4%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 622 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 571 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.