PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 25%Slider 22%Sweeper 6%Cutter 4%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.