PITCHER MATCHUP

Jeffrey Springs vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jeffrey Springs's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jeffrey Springs's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .303vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Slider 22%Sweeper 6%Cutter 4%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jeffrey Springs, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-19 game page →