PITCHER MATCHUP

Javier Assad vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Javier Assad's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Javier Assad's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .356vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 39%Cutter 17%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%Changeup 7%Slider 3%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Javier Assad, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Jonah Cox RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.