PITCHER MATCHUP

Javier Assad vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Javier Assad's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Javier Assad's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .355vs RHH xwOBA .316Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 39%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Sweeper 9%Curveball 8%Changeup 6%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Javier Assad, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 574 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 469 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .229 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-04 game page →