PITCHER MATCHUP

Jared Jones vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jared Jones's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jared Jones's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .310vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Slider 35%Changeup 11%Curveball 8%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jared Jones, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 634 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.