PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .217vs RHH xwOBA .271Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 7%Changeup 3%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 VC Victor Caratini SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RK Ryan Kreidler RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Kreidler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.