PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .214vs RHH xwOBA .270Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 60%Slider 19%Curveball 13%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 VC Victor Caratini SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-09 game page →