PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .219vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 60%Slider 20%Curveball 13%Cutter 4%Changeup 3%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WC Willi Castro SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TF Tyler Freeman RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-26 game page →