PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .221vs RHH xwOBA .269Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 60%Slider 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 7%Changeup 3%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WC Willi Castro SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.