PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .215vs RHH xwOBA .272Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 18%Curveball 11%Cutter 7%Changeup 3%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 619 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT Jose Trevino RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Trevino
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.