PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .218vs RHH xwOBA .266Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 19%Curveball 13%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 582 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MM Matt McLain RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TF TJ Friedl LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DM Dane Myers RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.