PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .215vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 60%Slider 19%Curveball 13%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 AB Alec Bohm RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .380
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.