PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .221vs RHH xwOBA .268Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 7%Changeup 3%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 705 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 604 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .384
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.