PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .217vs RHH xwOBA .271Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 7%Changeup 3%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 563 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .379
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 541 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CC Colton Cowser LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CN Carlos Narváez RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Narváez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-20 game page →