PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .220vs RHH xwOBA .266Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 6%Changeup 3%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .331
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BB Brett Baty LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 FL Francisco Lindor SH .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Juan Soto LHB .415
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .451 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.