PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .219vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 60%Slider 20%Curveball 13%Cutter 4%Changeup 3%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .334
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BB Brett Baty LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MS Marcus Semien RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Juan Soto LHB .417
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .455 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LT Luis Torrens RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Torrens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 FL Francisco Lindor SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 541 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-21 game page →