PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .217vs RHH xwOBA .278Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 18%Curveball 12%Cutter 7%Changeup 2%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .334
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 638 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .410
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .443 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.