PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .215vs RHH xwOBA .272Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 18%Curveball 11%Cutter 7%Changeup 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .333
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 632 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.