PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .217vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 18%Curveball 11%Cutter 8%Changeup 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .334
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AF Alex Freeland SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.