PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Chicago Cubs

How the Chicago Cubs's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .217vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 18%Curveball 11%Cutter 8%Changeup 2%

How the Chicago Cubs's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago Cubs's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 NH Nico Hoerner RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nico Hoerner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PC Pete Crow-Armstrong LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Crow-Armstrong
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AB Alex Bregman RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Bregman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Michael Busch LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Busch
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DS Dansby Swanson RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dansby Swanson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 PR Pedro Ramírez SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MA Miguel Amaya RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Amaya
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 MS Matt Shaw RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Shaw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GA Gabriel Arias RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Arias
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.