PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .217vs RHH xwOBA .266Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 AB Alec Burleson LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW Jordan Walker RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 BJ Blaze Jordan RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Blaze Jordan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.