PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .221vs RHH xwOBA .268Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 7%Changeup 3%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 666 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.