PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .215vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 60%Slider 19%Curveball 13%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 OA Ozzie Albies SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MO Matt Olson LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 609 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MH Michael Harris II LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DS Dominic Smith LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.