PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .215vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 60%Slider 19%Curveball 13%Cutter 5%Changeup 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 516 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-02 game page →