PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob Misiorowski vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob Misiorowski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob Misiorowski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .221vs RHH xwOBA .268Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 61%Slider 19%Curveball 12%Cutter 7%Changeup 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob Misiorowski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 502 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (61% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.