PITCHER MATCHUP

Jacob deGrom vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jacob deGrom's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jacob deGrom's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .289vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 37%Changeup 12%Curveball 5%Sinker 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jacob deGrom, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .302
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Jorge Soler RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (37% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-07 game page →