PITCHER MATCHUP

Jackson Jobe vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jackson Jobe's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jackson Jobe's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .350vs RHH xwOBA .343Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Slider 28%Changeup 15%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jackson Jobe, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.