PITCHER MATCHUP

Jackson Jobe vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jackson Jobe's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jackson Jobe's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .342vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Slider 27%Sinker 15%Changeup 14%Curveball 9%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jackson Jobe, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KK Kyle Karros RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-13 game page →