PITCHER MATCHUP

Jackson Jobe vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jackson Jobe's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jackson Jobe's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .307vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 28%Sinker 16%Changeup 13%Curveball 10%Cutter 1%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jackson Jobe, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .270
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.