PITCHER MATCHUP

Jackson Jobe vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jackson Jobe's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jackson Jobe's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .363vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Slider 28%Changeup 15%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jackson Jobe, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .270
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RP Richie Palacios LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NF Nick Fortes RHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.