PITCHER MATCHUP

Jackson Jobe vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jackson Jobe's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jackson Jobe's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .342Seasons 2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Slider 30%Changeup 17%Sinker 13%Curveball 8%Sweeper 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jackson Jobe, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 584 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Daniel Susac RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  8. 8 CK Christian Koss RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-08 game page →