PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Sweeper 30%Changeup 16%Cutter 13%Sinker 2%Unknown 2%Slider 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CK Colt Keith LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.