PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Sinker 4%Slider 2%Unknown 2%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.