PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Boston Red Sox

How the Boston Red Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Sinker 4%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Boston Red Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Boston Red Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .304
  1. 1 WA Wilyer Abreu LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wilyer Abreu
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JD Jarren Duran LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jarren Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 637 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CD Caleb Durbin RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Caleb Durbin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Adley Rutschman SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AM Andruw Monasterio RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andruw Monasterio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Trevor Story RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Story
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CW Connor Wong RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Wong
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 EW Eli White RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eli White
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NS Nick Sogard SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Sogard
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.