PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Sinker 4%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 485 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .265
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.